EATSMART SNACKS vs ORIGINAL CHICHARRONES FRIED PORK RINDS
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
EATSMART SNACKS wins in 5 out of 10 nutrient categories
EATSMART SNACKS: 5
vs
ORIGINAL CHICHARRONES FRIED PORK RINDS: 3
(2 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | EATSMART SNACKS | ORIGINAL CHICHARRONES FRIED PORK RINDS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 464 cal | 600 cal | |
| Protein | 7.1 g | 53.3 g | |
| Carbs | 60.7 g | 0 g | |
| Fat | 25 g | 40 g | |
| Fiber | 7.1 g | 0 g | |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | EATSMART SNACKS | ORIGINAL CHICHARRONES FRIED PORK RINDS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
Minerals
| Mineral | EATSMART SNACKS | ORIGINAL CHICHARRONES FRIED PORK RINDS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 71 MG | 0 MG | |
| Iron, Fe | 2.6 MG | 0 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 1,107 MG | 1,533 MG |