DRESSING vs RED WINE BALSAMIC DRESSING
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
DRESSING wins in 4 out of 11 nutrient categories
DRESSING: 4
vs
RED WINE BALSAMIC DRESSING: 0
(7 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | DRESSING | RED WINE BALSAMIC DRESSING | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 133 cal | 290 cal | |
| Protein | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Carbs | 10 g | 12.9 g | |
| Fat | 10 g | 25.8 g | |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | DRESSING | RED WINE BALSAMIC DRESSING | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
Minerals
| Mineral | DRESSING | RED WINE BALSAMIC DRESSING | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
| Iron, Fe | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
| Potassium, K | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
| Sodium, Na | 1,033 MG | 839 MG |