DRESSING vs CLASSIC RANCH FAT FREE DRESSING
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
CLASSIC RANCH FAT FREE DRESSING wins in 4 out of 11 nutrient categories
DRESSING: 2
vs
CLASSIC RANCH FAT FREE DRESSING: 4
(5 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | DRESSING | CLASSIC RANCH FAT FREE DRESSING | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 267 cal | 100 cal | |
| Protein | 3.3 g | 0 g | |
| Carbs | 6.7 g | 20 g | |
| Fat | 26.7 g | 0 g | |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | DRESSING | CLASSIC RANCH FAT FREE DRESSING | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
Minerals
| Mineral | DRESSING | CLASSIC RANCH FAT FREE DRESSING | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 67 MG | 67 MG | Tie |
| Iron, Fe | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
| Potassium, K | 0 MG | 100 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 900 MG | 933 MG |