DRESSING vs HAMPTON CREEK
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
DRESSING wins in 3 out of 10 nutrient categories
DRESSING: 3
vs
HAMPTON CREEK: 1
(6 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | DRESSING | HAMPTON CREEK | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 333 cal | 643 cal | |
| Protein | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Carbs | 13.3 g | 0 g | |
| Fat | 33.3 g | 71.4 g | |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | DRESSING | HAMPTON CREEK | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
Minerals
| Mineral | DRESSING | HAMPTON CREEK | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
| Iron, Fe | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
| Sodium, Na | 700 MG | 571 MG |