DIETZ & WATSON vs DRESSING
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
DRESSING wins in 5 out of 10 nutrient categories
DIETZ & WATSON: 0
vs
DRESSING: 5
(5 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | DIETZ & WATSON | DRESSING | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 600 cal | 500 cal | |
| Protein | 0 g | 3.3 g | |
| Carbs | 6.7 g | 6.7 g | Tie |
| Fat | 60 g | 53.3 g | |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | DIETZ & WATSON | DRESSING | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
Minerals
| Mineral | DIETZ & WATSON | DRESSING | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 0 MG | 133 MG | |
| Iron, Fe | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
| Sodium, Na | 533 MG | 1,200 MG |