DECORATING SUGAR GREEN vs CANDIFETTI MARSHMALLOW TREAT DECORATIONS
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
CANDIFETTI MARSHMALLOW TREAT DECORATIONS wins in 2 out of 11 nutrient categories
DECORATING SUGAR GREEN: 0
vs
CANDIFETTI MARSHMALLOW TREAT DECORATIONS: 2
(9 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | DECORATING SUGAR GREEN | CANDIFETTI MARSHMALLOW TREAT DECORATIONS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 417 cal | 375 cal | |
| Protein | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Carbs | 100 g | 91.7 g | |
| Fat | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | DECORATING SUGAR GREEN | CANDIFETTI MARSHMALLOW TREAT DECORATIONS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
Minerals
| Mineral | DECORATING SUGAR GREEN | CANDIFETTI MARSHMALLOW TREAT DECORATIONS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
| Iron, Fe | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
| Potassium, K | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
| Sodium, Na | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |