DECORATING ICING vs HARRIS TEETER
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
HARRIS TEETER wins in 6 out of 10 nutrient categories
DECORATING ICING: 0
vs
HARRIS TEETER: 6
(4 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | DECORATING ICING | HARRIS TEETER | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 417 cal | 83 cal | |
| Protein | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Carbs | 66.7 g | 3.3 g | |
| Fat | 16.7 g | 5 g | |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | DECORATING ICING | HARRIS TEETER | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 12 MG |
Minerals
| Mineral | DECORATING ICING | HARRIS TEETER | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
| Iron, Fe | 0 MG | 1.2 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 167 MG | 217 MG |