DARK CHOCOLATE vs ROASTED CALIFORNIA ALMONDS COVERED IN MILK CHOCOLATE
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
ROASTED CALIFORNIA ALMONDS COVERED IN MILK CHOCOLATE wins in 5 out of 11 nutrient categories
DARK CHOCOLATE: 4
vs
ROASTED CALIFORNIA ALMONDS COVERED IN MILK CHOCOLATE: 5
(2 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | DARK CHOCOLATE | ROASTED CALIFORNIA ALMONDS COVERED IN MILK CHOCOLATE | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 452 cal | 514 cal | |
| Protein | 0 g | 8.1 g | |
| Carbs | 61.9 g | 0 g | |
| Fat | 26.2 g | 29.7 g | |
| Fiber | 4.8 g | 2.7 g | |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | DARK CHOCOLATE | ROASTED CALIFORNIA ALMONDS COVERED IN MILK CHOCOLATE | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
Minerals
| Mineral | DARK CHOCOLATE | ROASTED CALIFORNIA ALMONDS COVERED IN MILK CHOCOLATE | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 48 MG | 162 MG | |
| Iron, Fe | 3.4 MG | 3.9 MG | |
| Potassium, K | 0 MG | 378 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 202 MG | 68 MG |