DARK CHOCOLATE NON PAREILS vs RICEMILK CHOCOLATE FLAVORED CONFECTIONARY MINIS
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
DARK CHOCOLATE NON PAREILS wins in 4 out of 11 nutrient categories
DARK CHOCOLATE NON PAREILS: 4
vs
RICEMILK CHOCOLATE FLAVORED CONFECTIONARY MINIS: 2
(5 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | DARK CHOCOLATE NON PAREILS | RICEMILK CHOCOLATE FLAVORED CONFECTIONARY MINIS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 467 cal | 500 cal | |
| Protein | 3.3 g | 0 g | |
| Carbs | 66.7 g | 60 g | |
| Fat | 26.7 g | 35 g | |
| Fiber | 3.3 g | 0 g | |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | DARK CHOCOLATE NON PAREILS | RICEMILK CHOCOLATE FLAVORED CONFECTIONARY MINIS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
Minerals
| Mineral | DARK CHOCOLATE NON PAREILS | RICEMILK CHOCOLATE FLAVORED CONFECTIONARY MINIS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
| Iron, Fe | 3.6 MG | 3.6 MG | Tie |
| Potassium, K | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
| Sodium, Na | 0 MG | 100 MG |