DARK CHOCOLATE HIMALAYAN SALTED ALMONDS vs LUNDS & BYERLYS
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
It's a tie — both foods score equally across 12 nutrient categories
DARK CHOCOLATE HIMALAYAN SALTED ALMONDS: 5
vs
LUNDS & BYERLYS: 5
(2 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | DARK CHOCOLATE HIMALAYAN SALTED ALMONDS | LUNDS & BYERLYS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 533 cal | 429 cal | |
| Protein | 13.3 g | 10.7 g | |
| Carbs | 36.7 g | 53.6 g | |
| Fat | 46.7 g | 21.4 g | |
| Fiber | 10 g | 10.7 g | |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | DARK CHOCOLATE HIMALAYAN SALTED ALMONDS | LUNDS & BYERLYS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 17.1 MG | |
| Vitamin D (D2 + D3) | 0 UG | 0 UG | Tie |
Minerals
| Mineral | DARK CHOCOLATE HIMALAYAN SALTED ALMONDS | LUNDS & BYERLYS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 133 MG | 143 MG | |
| Iron, Fe | 7 MG | 3.9 MG | |
| Potassium, K | 533 MG | 0 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 200 MG | 0 MG |