DARK CHOCOLATE COVERED WITH WHITE CANDY NONPAREILS vs ROASTED CALIFORNIA ALMONDS COVERED IN MILK CHOCOLATE
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
ROASTED CALIFORNIA ALMONDS COVERED IN MILK CHOCOLATE wins in 7 out of 12 nutrient categories
DARK CHOCOLATE COVERED WITH WHITE CANDY NONPAREILS: 2
vs
ROASTED CALIFORNIA ALMONDS COVERED IN MILK CHOCOLATE: 7
(3 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | DARK CHOCOLATE COVERED WITH WHITE CANDY NONPAREILS | ROASTED CALIFORNIA ALMONDS COVERED IN MILK CHOCOLATE | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 500 cal | 514 cal | |
| Protein | 3.3 g | 8.1 g | |
| Carbs | 73.3 g | 0 g | |
| Fat | 20 g | 29.7 g | |
| Fiber | 0 g | 2.7 g | |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | DARK CHOCOLATE COVERED WITH WHITE CANDY NONPAREILS | ROASTED CALIFORNIA ALMONDS COVERED IN MILK CHOCOLATE | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
| Vitamin D (D2 + D3) | 0 UG | 0 UG | Tie |
Minerals
| Mineral | DARK CHOCOLATE COVERED WITH WHITE CANDY NONPAREILS | ROASTED CALIFORNIA ALMONDS COVERED IN MILK CHOCOLATE | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 0 MG | 162 MG | |
| Iron, Fe | 0 MG | 3.9 MG | |
| Potassium, K | 0 MG | 378 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 0 MG | 68 MG |