DARK CHOCOLATE COVERED THIN MINTS vs LUNDS & BYERLYS
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
LUNDS & BYERLYS wins in 7 out of 11 nutrient categories
DARK CHOCOLATE COVERED THIN MINTS: 3
vs
LUNDS & BYERLYS: 7
(1 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | DARK CHOCOLATE COVERED THIN MINTS | LUNDS & BYERLYS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 400 cal | 526 cal | |
| Protein | 0 g | 7.9 g | |
| Carbs | 80 g | 55.3 g | |
| Fat | 10 g | 34.2 g | |
| Fiber | 0 g | 2.6 g | |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | DARK CHOCOLATE COVERED THIN MINTS | LUNDS & BYERLYS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 3.2 MG |
Minerals
| Mineral | DARK CHOCOLATE COVERED THIN MINTS | LUNDS & BYERLYS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 7 MG | 211 MG | |
| Iron, Fe | 0 MG | 1.0 MG | |
| Potassium, K | 123 MG | 0 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 0 MG | 79 MG |