DARK CHOCOLATE COVERED PRETZELS vs SOAKED & DEHYDRATED CALIFORNIA ALMONDS
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
It's a tie — both foods score equally across 11 nutrient categories
DARK CHOCOLATE COVERED PRETZELS: 5
vs
SOAKED & DEHYDRATED CALIFORNIA ALMONDS: 5
(1 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | DARK CHOCOLATE COVERED PRETZELS | SOAKED & DEHYDRATED CALIFORNIA ALMONDS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 500 cal | 567 cal | |
| Protein | 5.6 g | 20 g | |
| Carbs | 61.1 g | 20 g | |
| Fat | 27.8 g | 46.7 g | |
| Fiber | 0 g | 10 g | |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | DARK CHOCOLATE COVERED PRETZELS | SOAKED & DEHYDRATED CALIFORNIA ALMONDS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 4 MG |
Minerals
| Mineral | DARK CHOCOLATE COVERED PRETZELS | SOAKED & DEHYDRATED CALIFORNIA ALMONDS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 33 MG | 267 MG | |
| Iron, Fe | 5.6 MG | 4.8 MG | |
| Potassium, K | 539 MG | 0 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 278 MG | 0 MG |