DARK CHOCOLATE COVERED EGGS vs RICEMILK CHOCOLATE FLAVORED CONFECTIONARY MINIS
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
DARK CHOCOLATE COVERED EGGS wins in 4 out of 10 nutrient categories
DARK CHOCOLATE COVERED EGGS: 4
vs
RICEMILK CHOCOLATE FLAVORED CONFECTIONARY MINIS: 3
(3 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | DARK CHOCOLATE COVERED EGGS | RICEMILK CHOCOLATE FLAVORED CONFECTIONARY MINIS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 375 cal | 500 cal | |
| Protein | 3.1 g | 0 g | |
| Carbs | 62.5 g | 60 g | |
| Fat | 12.5 g | 35 g | |
| Fiber | 3.1 g | 0 g | |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | DARK CHOCOLATE COVERED EGGS | RICEMILK CHOCOLATE FLAVORED CONFECTIONARY MINIS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
Minerals
| Mineral | DARK CHOCOLATE COVERED EGGS | RICEMILK CHOCOLATE FLAVORED CONFECTIONARY MINIS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
| Iron, Fe | 1.1 MG | 3.6 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 62 MG | 100 MG |