DARK CHOCOLATE COVERED ALMONDS vs BUTTERED DOUBLE SUCCOTASH
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
DARK CHOCOLATE COVERED ALMONDS wins in 5 out of 10 nutrient categories
DARK CHOCOLATE COVERED ALMONDS: 5
vs
BUTTERED DOUBLE SUCCOTASH: 4
(1 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | DARK CHOCOLATE COVERED ALMONDS | BUTTERED DOUBLE SUCCOTASH | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 500 cal | 85 cal | |
| Protein | 10 g | 3.1 g | |
| Carbs | 50 g | 15.4 g | |
| Fat | 36.7 g | 1.9 g | |
| Fiber | 10 g | 2.3 g | |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Minerals
| Mineral | DARK CHOCOLATE COVERED ALMONDS | BUTTERED DOUBLE SUCCOTASH | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 100 MG | 20 MG | |
| Iron, Fe | 6.3 MG | 0.8 MG | |
| Potassium, K | 467 MG | 217 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 0 MG | 300 MG |