DARK CHOCOLATE COVERED ALMONDS vs LUNDS & BYERLYS
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
LUNDS & BYERLYS wins in 5 out of 10 nutrient categories
DARK CHOCOLATE COVERED ALMONDS: 4
vs
LUNDS & BYERLYS: 5
(1 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | DARK CHOCOLATE COVERED ALMONDS | LUNDS & BYERLYS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 525 cal | 643 cal | |
| Protein | 7.5 g | 14.3 g | |
| Carbs | 50 g | 39.3 g | |
| Fat | 37.5 g | 25 g | |
| Fiber | 7.5 g | 14.3 g | |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | DARK CHOCOLATE COVERED ALMONDS | LUNDS & BYERLYS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 4.3 MG |
Minerals
| Mineral | DARK CHOCOLATE COVERED ALMONDS | LUNDS & BYERLYS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 100 MG | 71 MG | |
| Iron, Fe | 2.7 MG | 2.6 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 62 MG | 0 MG |