DARK CHOCOLATE ALMOND & SALTED CARAMEL BARK vs RICEMILK CHOCOLATE FLAVORED CONFECTIONARY MINIS
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
DARK CHOCOLATE ALMOND & SALTED CARAMEL BARK wins in 6 out of 11 nutrient categories
DARK CHOCOLATE ALMOND & SALTED CARAMEL BARK: 6
vs
RICEMILK CHOCOLATE FLAVORED CONFECTIONARY MINIS: 3
(2 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | DARK CHOCOLATE ALMOND & SALTED CARAMEL BARK | RICEMILK CHOCOLATE FLAVORED CONFECTIONARY MINIS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 529 cal | 500 cal | |
| Protein | 11.8 g | 0 g | |
| Carbs | 47.1 g | 60 g | |
| Fat | 38.2 g | 35 g | |
| Fiber | 8.8 g | 0 g | |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | DARK CHOCOLATE ALMOND & SALTED CARAMEL BARK | RICEMILK CHOCOLATE FLAVORED CONFECTIONARY MINIS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
Minerals
| Mineral | DARK CHOCOLATE ALMOND & SALTED CARAMEL BARK | RICEMILK CHOCOLATE FLAVORED CONFECTIONARY MINIS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 118 MG | 0 MG | |
| Iron, Fe | 9.4 MG | 3.6 MG | |
| Potassium, K | 529 MG | 0 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 59 MG | 100 MG |