CURRIED POTATO AND CHICKEN ROLLS vs HICKORY HAM & CHEDDAR WITH REDUCED FAT CHEDDAR CHEESE & SAUCE IN A CROISSANT CRUST SANDWICHES
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
CURRIED POTATO AND CHICKEN ROLLS wins in 5 out of 10 nutrient categories
CURRIED POTATO AND CHICKEN ROLLS: 5
vs
HICKORY HAM & CHEDDAR WITH REDUCED FAT CHEDDAR CHEESE & SAUCE IN A CROISSANT CRUST SANDWICHES: 4
(1 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | CURRIED POTATO AND CHICKEN ROLLS | HICKORY HAM & CHEDDAR WITH REDUCED FAT CHEDDAR CHEESE & SAUCE IN A CROISSANT CRUST SANDWICHES | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 241 cal | 244 cal | |
| Protein | 8.9 g | 7.1 g | |
| Carbs | 27.9 g | 27.6 g | |
| Fat | 11.4 g | 11.8 g | |
| Fiber | 1.3 g | 0.8 g | |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | CURRIED POTATO AND CHICKEN ROLLS | HICKORY HAM & CHEDDAR WITH REDUCED FAT CHEDDAR CHEESE & SAUCE IN A CROISSANT CRUST SANDWICHES | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 7.6 MG | 0 MG |
Minerals
| Mineral | CURRIED POTATO AND CHICKEN ROLLS | HICKORY HAM & CHEDDAR WITH REDUCED FAT CHEDDAR CHEESE & SAUCE IN A CROISSANT CRUST SANDWICHES | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 0 MG | 79 MG | |
| Iron, Fe | 0.9 MG | 1.4 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 354 MG | 386 MG |