CUMBERLAND FARMS vs MOTHER RUCKER'S SWEETS
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
CUMBERLAND FARMS wins in 5 out of 10 nutrient categories
CUMBERLAND FARMS: 5
vs
MOTHER RUCKER'S SWEETS: 3
(2 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | CUMBERLAND FARMS | MOTHER RUCKER'S SWEETS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 506 cal | 474 cal | |
| Protein | 3.5 g | 2.6 g | |
| Carbs | 58.8 g | 57.9 g | |
| Fat | 29.4 g | 23.7 g | |
| Fiber | 1.2 g | 0 g | |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | CUMBERLAND FARMS | MOTHER RUCKER'S SWEETS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
Minerals
| Mineral | CUMBERLAND FARMS | MOTHER RUCKER'S SWEETS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 47 MG | 0 MG | |
| Iron, Fe | 1.7 MG | 0 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 729 MG | 500 MG |