CUMBERLAND FARMS vs SHOESTRING POTATOES
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
CUMBERLAND FARMS wins in 5 out of 10 nutrient categories
CUMBERLAND FARMS: 5
vs
SHOESTRING POTATOES: 3
(2 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | CUMBERLAND FARMS | SHOESTRING POTATOES | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 464 cal | 563 cal | |
| Protein | 14.3 g | 7.0 g | |
| Carbs | 64.3 g | 49.3 g | |
| Fat | 17.9 g | 38.7 g | |
| Fiber | 3.6 g | 3.5 g | |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | CUMBERLAND FARMS | SHOESTRING POTATOES | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 31.7 MG |
Minerals
| Mineral | CUMBERLAND FARMS | SHOESTRING POTATOES | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
| Iron, Fe | 3.9 MG | 2.5 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 500 MG | 599 MG |