CUMBERLAND FARMS vs ORIGINAL KETTLE COOKED POTATO CHIPS
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
It's a tie, both foods score equally across 11 nutrient categories
CUMBERLAND FARMS: 3
vs
ORIGINAL KETTLE COOKED POTATO CHIPS: 3
(5 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | CUMBERLAND FARMS | ORIGINAL KETTLE COOKED POTATO CHIPS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 464 cal | 464 cal | Tie |
| Protein | 14.3 g | 7.1 g | |
| Carbs | 64.3 g | 67.9 g | |
| Fat | 17.9 g | 17.9 g | Tie |
| Fiber | 3.6 g | 3.6 g | Tie |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | CUMBERLAND FARMS | ORIGINAL KETTLE COOKED POTATO CHIPS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
Minerals
| Mineral | CUMBERLAND FARMS | ORIGINAL KETTLE COOKED POTATO CHIPS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 0 MG | 18 MG | |
| Iron, Fe | 3.9 MG | 0 MG | |
| Potassium, K | 0 MG | 1,261 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 500 MG | 536 MG |