CUMBERLAND FARMS vs THINS POTATO CHIPS
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
CUMBERLAND FARMS wins in 6 out of 11 nutrient categories
CUMBERLAND FARMS: 6
vs
THINS POTATO CHIPS: 3
(2 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | CUMBERLAND FARMS | THINS POTATO CHIPS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 518 cal | 571 cal | |
| Protein | 7.1 g | 7.1 g | |
| Carbs | 61.2 g | 53.6 g | |
| Fat | 25.9 g | 35.7 g | |
| Fiber | 4.7 g | 3.6 g | |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | CUMBERLAND FARMS | THINS POTATO CHIPS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 28.2 MG | 53.6 MG |
Minerals
| Mineral | CUMBERLAND FARMS | THINS POTATO CHIPS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
| Iron, Fe | 1.7 MG | 1.3 MG | |
| Potassium, K | 1,200 MG | 0 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 941 MG | 679 MG |