CUMBERLAND FAMRS vs DARK CHOCOLATE COVERED ROLLED WAFERS
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
CUMBERLAND FAMRS wins in 4 out of 10 nutrient categories
CUMBERLAND FAMRS: 4
vs
DARK CHOCOLATE COVERED ROLLED WAFERS: 3
(3 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | CUMBERLAND FAMRS | DARK CHOCOLATE COVERED ROLLED WAFERS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 410 cal | 500 cal | |
| Protein | 5.1 g | 5.6 g | |
| Carbs | 66.7 g | 66.7 g | Tie |
| Fat | 20.5 g | 25 g | |
| Fiber | 7.7 g | 2.8 g | |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | CUMBERLAND FAMRS | DARK CHOCOLATE COVERED ROLLED WAFERS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
Minerals
| Mineral | CUMBERLAND FAMRS | DARK CHOCOLATE COVERED ROLLED WAFERS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 0 MG | 56 MG | |
| Iron, Fe | 6.9 MG | 1 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 38 MG | 42 MG |