CUBAN STYLE FULLY COOKED ROAST PORK vs BACON WRAPPED SWEET SRIRACHA SHRIMP
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
CUBAN STYLE FULLY COOKED ROAST PORK wins in 6 out of 12 nutrient categories
CUBAN STYLE FULLY COOKED ROAST PORK: 6
vs
BACON WRAPPED SWEET SRIRACHA SHRIMP: 4
(2 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | CUBAN STYLE FULLY COOKED ROAST PORK | BACON WRAPPED SWEET SRIRACHA SHRIMP | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 208 cal | 194 cal | |
| Protein | 11.0 g | 19.4 g | |
| Carbs | 29.9 g | 11.8 g | |
| Fat | 5.2 g | 11.8 g | |
| Fiber | 1.3 g | 0 g | |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | CUBAN STYLE FULLY COOKED ROAST PORK | BACON WRAPPED SWEET SRIRACHA SHRIMP | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
| Vitamin D (D2 + D3) | 0 UG | 1 UG |
Minerals
| Mineral | CUBAN STYLE FULLY COOKED ROAST PORK | BACON WRAPPED SWEET SRIRACHA SHRIMP | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 97 MG | 19 MG | |
| Iron, Fe | 0.7 MG | 0.3 MG | |
| Potassium, K | 325 MG | 127 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 688 MG | 645 MG |