CRISPY GOLDEN TATTER PUFFS vs CLASSIC CUT FRIES
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
CLASSIC CUT FRIES wins in 5 out of 11 nutrient categories
CRISPY GOLDEN TATTER PUFFS: 4
vs
CLASSIC CUT FRIES: 5
(2 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | CRISPY GOLDEN TATTER PUFFS | CLASSIC CUT FRIES | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 186 cal | 155 cal | |
| Protein | 1.2 g | 2.4 g | |
| Carbs | 26.7 g | 25 g | |
| Fat | 9.3 g | 4.8 g | |
| Fiber | 1.2 g | 2.4 g | |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | CRISPY GOLDEN TATTER PUFFS | CLASSIC CUT FRIES | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 10.5 MG | 4.3 MG |
Minerals
| Mineral | CRISPY GOLDEN TATTER PUFFS | CLASSIC CUT FRIES | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
| Iron, Fe | 0.8 MG | 0.4 MG | |
| Potassium, K | 267 MG | 0 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 395 MG | 333 MG |