CRINKLE CUT FRIES vs SHOESTRINGS CRISP THIN CUT FRIED POTATOES
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
CRINKLE CUT FRIES wins in 5 out of 11 nutrient categories
CRINKLE CUT FRIES: 5
vs
SHOESTRINGS CRISP THIN CUT FRIED POTATOES: 3
(3 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | CRINKLE CUT FRIES | SHOESTRINGS CRISP THIN CUT FRIED POTATOES | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 129 cal | 167 cal | |
| Protein | 2.4 g | 2.4 g | |
| Carbs | 23.5 g | 26.2 g | |
| Fat | 2.9 g | 6.0 g | |
| Fiber | 2.4 g | 2.4 g | Tie |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | CRINKLE CUT FRIES | SHOESTRINGS CRISP THIN CUT FRIED POTATOES | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 5.6 MG | 0 MG |
Minerals
| Mineral | CRINKLE CUT FRIES | SHOESTRINGS CRISP THIN CUT FRIED POTATOES | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
| Iron, Fe | 0.9 MG | 0 MG | |
| Potassium, K | 0 MG | 417 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 65 MG | 393 MG |