CREAMSICLE TAFFY vs CHOCOLATEY COVERED MARSHMALLOW SANTAS
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
CREAMSICLE TAFFY wins in 5 out of 10 nutrient categories
CREAMSICLE TAFFY: 5
vs
CHOCOLATEY COVERED MARSHMALLOW SANTAS: 3
(2 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | CREAMSICLE TAFFY | CHOCOLATEY COVERED MARSHMALLOW SANTAS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 375 cal | 409 cal | |
| Protein | 2.5 g | 0 g | |
| Carbs | 82.5 g | 81.8 g | |
| Fat | 5 g | 9.1 g | |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Minerals
| Mineral | CREAMSICLE TAFFY | CHOCOLATEY COVERED MARSHMALLOW SANTAS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 8 MG | 9 MG | |
| Iron, Fe | 0.9 MG | 0 MG | |
| Potassium, K | 110 MG | 145 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 275 MG | 0 MG |