CRANBERRY ALMOND THIN COOKIES vs FUDGE MARSHMALLOW WHIRLS COOKIES
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
CRANBERRY ALMOND THIN COOKIES wins in 7 out of 11 nutrient categories
CRANBERRY ALMOND THIN COOKIES: 7
vs
FUDGE MARSHMALLOW WHIRLS COOKIES: 1
(3 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | CRANBERRY ALMOND THIN COOKIES | FUDGE MARSHMALLOW WHIRLS COOKIES | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 433 cal | 448 cal | |
| Protein | 13.3 g | 3.5 g | |
| Carbs | 66.7 g | 69.0 g | |
| Fat | 15 g | 17.2 g | |
| Fiber | 3.3 g | 3.4 g | |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | CRANBERRY ALMOND THIN COOKIES | FUDGE MARSHMALLOW WHIRLS COOKIES | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
Minerals
| Mineral | CRANBERRY ALMOND THIN COOKIES | FUDGE MARSHMALLOW WHIRLS COOKIES | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 133 MG | 0 MG | |
| Iron, Fe | 3.6 MG | 3.5 MG | |
| Potassium, K | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
| Sodium, Na | 267 MG | 172 MG |