COVERED IN DARK CHOCOLATE CALIFORNIA RAISINS vs THINDULGENT MILK CHOCOLATE BARK
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
COVERED IN DARK CHOCOLATE CALIFORNIA RAISINS wins in 6 out of 12 nutrient categories
COVERED IN DARK CHOCOLATE CALIFORNIA RAISINS: 6
vs
THINDULGENT MILK CHOCOLATE BARK: 3
(3 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | COVERED IN DARK CHOCOLATE CALIFORNIA RAISINS | THINDULGENT MILK CHOCOLATE BARK | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 458 cal | 500 cal | |
| Protein | 4.2 g | 2.5 g | |
| Carbs | 70.8 g | 60 g | |
| Fat | 18.8 g | 27.5 g | |
| Fiber | 4.2 g | 2.5 g | |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | COVERED IN DARK CHOCOLATE CALIFORNIA RAISINS | THINDULGENT MILK CHOCOLATE BARK | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
| Vitamin D (D2 + D3) | 0 UG | 0 UG | Tie |
Minerals
| Mineral | COVERED IN DARK CHOCOLATE CALIFORNIA RAISINS | THINDULGENT MILK CHOCOLATE BARK | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 0 MG | 50 MG | |
| Iron, Fe | 1.3 MG | 0.9 MG | |
| Potassium, K | 500 MG | 0 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 0 MG | 62 MG |