COTTONDALE vs SHURSAVING
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
SHURSAVING wins in 4 out of 10 nutrient categories
COTTONDALE: 3
vs
SHURSAVING: 4
(3 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | COTTONDALE | SHURSAVING | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 429 cal | 440 cal | |
| Protein | 2.4 g | 4 g | |
| Carbs | 61.9 g | 72 g | |
| Fat | 19.1 g | 14 g | |
| Fiber | 2.4 g | 0 g | |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | COTTONDALE | SHURSAVING | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
Minerals
| Mineral | COTTONDALE | SHURSAVING | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
| Iron, Fe | 2.6 MG | 2.9 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 214 MG | 420 MG |