COTTONDALE vs MINI MARSH MALLOWS
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
COTTONDALE wins in 5 out of 10 nutrient categories
COTTONDALE: 5
vs
MINI MARSH MALLOWS: 3
(2 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | COTTONDALE | MINI MARSH MALLOWS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 514 cal | 333 cal | |
| Protein | 2.7 g | 3.3 g | |
| Carbs | 70.3 g | 80 g | |
| Fat | 29.7 g | 0 g | |
| Fiber | 2.7 g | 0 g | |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | COTTONDALE | MINI MARSH MALLOWS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
Minerals
| Mineral | COTTONDALE | MINI MARSH MALLOWS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 54 MG | 0 MG | |
| Iron, Fe | 2.9 MG | 0 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 81 MG | 50 MG |