COTTONDALE vs LINDT
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
LINDT wins in 5 out of 10 nutrient categories
COTTONDALE: 3
vs
LINDT: 5
(2 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | COTTONDALE | LINDT | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 535 cal | 548 cal | |
| Protein | 2.3 g | 11.9 g | |
| Carbs | 67.4 g | 50 g | |
| Fat | 30.2 g | 35.7 g | |
| Fiber | 2.3 g | 4.8 g | |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | COTTONDALE | LINDT | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
Minerals
| Mineral | COTTONDALE | LINDT | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 47 MG | 238 MG | |
| Iron, Fe | 2.5 MG | 1.7 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 58 MG | 119 MG |