COTTONDALE vs MILK CHOCOLATE COVERED GUMMI BEARS
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
It's a tie, both foods score equally across 10 nutrient categories
COTTONDALE: 4
vs
MILK CHOCOLATE COVERED GUMMI BEARS: 4
(2 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | COTTONDALE | MILK CHOCOLATE COVERED GUMMI BEARS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 500 cal | 350 cal | |
| Protein | 3.6 g | 2.5 g | |
| Carbs | 67.9 g | 65 g | |
| Fat | 28.6 g | 20 g | |
| Fiber | 3.6 g | 0 g | |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | COTTONDALE | MILK CHOCOLATE COVERED GUMMI BEARS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
Minerals
| Mineral | COTTONDALE | MILK CHOCOLATE COVERED GUMMI BEARS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 0 MG | 150 MG | |
| Iron, Fe | 2.6 MG | 0 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 54 MG | 38 MG |