CORN DOGS vs CLASSIC CORN DOGS BATTER-WRAPPED FRANKS ON A STICK
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
It's a tie, both foods score equally across 10 nutrient categories
CORN DOGS: 0
vs
CLASSIC CORN DOGS BATTER-WRAPPED FRANKS ON A STICK: 0
(10 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | CORN DOGS | CLASSIC CORN DOGS BATTER-WRAPPED FRANKS ON A STICK | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 289 cal | 289 cal | Tie |
| Protein | 7.9 g | 7.9 g | Tie |
| Carbs | 31.6 g | 31.6 g | Tie |
| Fat | 14.5 g | 14.5 g | Tie |
| Fiber | 1.3 g | 1.3 g | Tie |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | CORN DOGS | CLASSIC CORN DOGS BATTER-WRAPPED FRANKS ON A STICK | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
Minerals
| Mineral | CORN DOGS | CLASSIC CORN DOGS BATTER-WRAPPED FRANKS ON A STICK | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 53 MG | 53 MG | Tie |
| Iron, Fe | 1.9 MG | 1.9 MG | Tie |
| Sodium, Na | 803 MG | 803 MG | Tie |