COOKOO FOR COOKIES DELICIOUS SNACKING MARSHMALLOWS vs TAMARIND SOFT CANDY
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
TAMARIND SOFT CANDY wins in 4 out of 10 nutrient categories
COOKOO FOR COOKIES DELICIOUS SNACKING MARSHMALLOWS: 2
vs
TAMARIND SOFT CANDY: 4
(4 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | COOKOO FOR COOKIES DELICIOUS SNACKING MARSHMALLOWS | TAMARIND SOFT CANDY | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 393 cal | 340 cal | |
| Protein | 3.6 g | 0 g | |
| Carbs | 75 g | 84 g | |
| Fat | 7.1 g | 0 g | |
| Fiber | 0 g | 2 g | |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Minerals
| Mineral | COOKOO FOR COOKIES DELICIOUS SNACKING MARSHMALLOWS | TAMARIND SOFT CANDY | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
| Iron, Fe | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
| Potassium, K | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
| Sodium, Na | 71 MG | 776 MG |