COOKIES vs FUDGE MARSHMALLOW RING COOKIES
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
COOKIES wins in 5 out of 11 nutrient categories
COOKIES: 5
vs
FUDGE MARSHMALLOW RING COOKIES: 3
(3 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | COOKIES | FUDGE MARSHMALLOW RING COOKIES | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 464 cal | 448 cal | |
| Protein | 7.1 g | 3.5 g | |
| Carbs | 71.4 g | 69.0 g | |
| Fat | 16.1 g | 17.2 g | |
| Fiber | 3.6 g | 3.4 g | |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | COOKIES | FUDGE MARSHMALLOW RING COOKIES | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
Minerals
| Mineral | COOKIES | FUDGE MARSHMALLOW RING COOKIES | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
| Iron, Fe | 2.6 MG | 3.1 MG | |
| Potassium, K | 89 MG | 0 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 464 MG | 172 MG |