COOKIE DOUGH SMASHMALLOW SNACKABLE MARSHMALLOWS vs PICATAMARIND TAMARIND FLAVORED GUMMY COATED WITH CHILI AND SUGAR GUMMIES
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
PICATAMARIND TAMARIND FLAVORED GUMMY COATED WITH CHILI AND SUGAR GUMMIES wins in 3 out of 10 nutrient categories
COOKIE DOUGH SMASHMALLOW SNACKABLE MARSHMALLOWS: 2
vs
PICATAMARIND TAMARIND FLAVORED GUMMY COATED WITH CHILI AND SUGAR GUMMIES: 3
(5 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | COOKIE DOUGH SMASHMALLOW SNACKABLE MARSHMALLOWS | PICATAMARIND TAMARIND FLAVORED GUMMY COATED WITH CHILI AND SUGAR GUMMIES | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 333 cal | 333 cal | Tie |
| Protein | 3.3 g | 0 g | |
| Carbs | 73.3 g | 83.3 g | |
| Fat | 1.7 g | 0 g | |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Minerals
| Mineral | COOKIE DOUGH SMASHMALLOW SNACKABLE MARSHMALLOWS | PICATAMARIND TAMARIND FLAVORED GUMMY COATED WITH CHILI AND SUGAR GUMMIES | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 0 MG | 30 MG | |
| Iron, Fe | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
| Potassium, K | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
| Sodium, Na | 150 MG | 2,100 MG |