COOKED TAIL-ON SHRIMP vs BLACKENED ATLANTIC SALMON ON CEDAR PLANK
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
COOKED TAIL-ON SHRIMP wins in 6 out of 10 nutrient categories
COOKED TAIL-ON SHRIMP: 6
vs
BLACKENED ATLANTIC SALMON ON CEDAR PLANK: 2
(2 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | COOKED TAIL-ON SHRIMP | BLACKENED ATLANTIC SALMON ON CEDAR PLANK | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 95 cal | 239 cal | |
| Protein | 21.4 g | 19.5 g | |
| Carbs | 0 g | 1.8 g | |
| Fat | 0.6 g | 16.8 g | |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | COOKED TAIL-ON SHRIMP | BLACKENED ATLANTIC SALMON ON CEDAR PLANK | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 4.2 MG |
Minerals
| Mineral | COOKED TAIL-ON SHRIMP | BLACKENED ATLANTIC SALMON ON CEDAR PLANK | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 119 MG | 18 MG | |
| Iron, Fe | 3.2 MG | 0.6 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 226 MG | 283 MG |