COOKED SHRIMP RING vs CUBAN STYLE FULLY COOKED ROAST PORK
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
CUBAN STYLE FULLY COOKED ROAST PORK wins in 6 out of 11 nutrient categories
COOKED SHRIMP RING: 3
vs
CUBAN STYLE FULLY COOKED ROAST PORK: 6
(2 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | COOKED SHRIMP RING | CUBAN STYLE FULLY COOKED ROAST PORK | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 85 cal | 208 cal | |
| Protein | 9.9 g | 11.0 g | |
| Carbs | 10.6 g | 29.9 g | |
| Fat | 0.4 g | 5.2 g | |
| Fiber | 0.7 g | 1.3 g | |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | COOKED SHRIMP RING | CUBAN STYLE FULLY COOKED ROAST PORK | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
Minerals
| Mineral | COOKED SHRIMP RING | CUBAN STYLE FULLY COOKED ROAST PORK | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 42 MG | 97 MG | |
| Iron, Fe | 0.3 MG | 0.7 MG | |
| Potassium, K | 0 MG | 325 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 606 MG | 688 MG |