CONVENIENCE WITHOUT COMPROMISE vs WHEAT THINS
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
WHEAT THINS wins in 6 out of 11 nutrient categories
CONVENIENCE WITHOUT COMPROMISE: 3
vs
WHEAT THINS: 6
(2 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | CONVENIENCE WITHOUT COMPROMISE | WHEAT THINS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 400 cal | 483 cal | |
| Protein | 6.7 g | 6.9 g | |
| Carbs | 80 g | 72.4 g | |
| Fat | 3.3 g | 17.2 g | |
| Fiber | 6.7 g | 6.9 g | |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | CONVENIENCE WITHOUT COMPROMISE | WHEAT THINS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
Minerals
| Mineral | CONVENIENCE WITHOUT COMPROMISE | WHEAT THINS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 0 MG | 69 MG | |
| Iron, Fe | 0 MG | 2.5 MG | |
| Potassium, K | 0 MG | 190 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 867 MG | 310 MG |