COLOSSAL STYLE PORK CRACKLINS vs APPLE HARVEST
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
APPLE HARVEST wins in 5 out of 10 nutrient categories
COLOSSAL STYLE PORK CRACKLINS: 3
vs
APPLE HARVEST: 5
(2 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | COLOSSAL STYLE PORK CRACKLINS | APPLE HARVEST | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 571 cal | 500 cal | |
| Protein | 50 g | 10.7 g | |
| Carbs | 0 g | 57.1 g | |
| Fat | 42.9 g | 28.6 g | |
| Fiber | 0 g | 7.1 g | |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | COLOSSAL STYLE PORK CRACKLINS | APPLE HARVEST | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 4.3 MG |
Minerals
| Mineral | COLOSSAL STYLE PORK CRACKLINS | APPLE HARVEST | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
| Iron, Fe | 0 MG | 2.6 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 2,571 MG | 161 MG |