COLESLAW DRESSING vs BALSAMIC DRESSING
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
COLESLAW DRESSING wins in 4 out of 11 nutrient categories
COLESLAW DRESSING: 4
vs
BALSAMIC DRESSING: 2
(5 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | COLESLAW DRESSING | BALSAMIC DRESSING | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 367 cal | 357 cal | |
| Protein | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Carbs | 30 g | 21.4 g | |
| Fat | 30 g | 32.1 g | |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | COLESLAW DRESSING | BALSAMIC DRESSING | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
Minerals
| Mineral | COLESLAW DRESSING | BALSAMIC DRESSING | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 7 MG | 0 MG | |
| Iron, Fe | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
| Potassium, K | 20 MG | 0 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 433 MG | 429 MG |