COLD SMOKED WILD CAUGHT ALASKA SOCKEYE SALMON vs GARLIC & ONION TUNA BURGER
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
COLD SMOKED WILD CAUGHT ALASKA SOCKEYE SALMON wins in 5 out of 10 nutrient categories
COLD SMOKED WILD CAUGHT ALASKA SOCKEYE SALMON: 5
vs
GARLIC & ONION TUNA BURGER: 2
(3 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | COLD SMOKED WILD CAUGHT ALASKA SOCKEYE SALMON | GARLIC & ONION TUNA BURGER | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 211 cal | 224 cal | |
| Protein | 26.3 g | 17.7 g | |
| Carbs | 0 g | 3.5 g | |
| Fat | 10.5 g | 14.1 g | |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | COLD SMOKED WILD CAUGHT ALASKA SOCKEYE SALMON | GARLIC & ONION TUNA BURGER | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 1.4 MG |
Minerals
| Mineral | COLD SMOKED WILD CAUGHT ALASKA SOCKEYE SALMON | GARLIC & ONION TUNA BURGER | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
| Iron, Fe | 0 MG | 0.4 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 1,105 MG | 353 MG |