COCONUT & ROASTED ALMONDS COVERED IN DARK CHOCOLATE vs MARSHMALLOW MINI PUMPKINS IN LUSCIOUS MILK CHOCOLATE
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
COCONUT & ROASTED ALMONDS COVERED IN DARK CHOCOLATE wins in 5 out of 11 nutrient categories
COCONUT & ROASTED ALMONDS COVERED IN DARK CHOCOLATE: 5
vs
MARSHMALLOW MINI PUMPKINS IN LUSCIOUS MILK CHOCOLATE: 4
(2 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | COCONUT & ROASTED ALMONDS COVERED IN DARK CHOCOLATE | MARSHMALLOW MINI PUMPKINS IN LUSCIOUS MILK CHOCOLATE | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 480 cal | 357 cal | |
| Protein | 4 g | 3.6 g | |
| Carbs | 56 g | 67.9 g | |
| Fat | 28 g | 10.7 g | |
| Fiber | 4 g | 0 g | |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | COCONUT & ROASTED ALMONDS COVERED IN DARK CHOCOLATE | MARSHMALLOW MINI PUMPKINS IN LUSCIOUS MILK CHOCOLATE | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
Minerals
| Mineral | COCONUT & ROASTED ALMONDS COVERED IN DARK CHOCOLATE | MARSHMALLOW MINI PUMPKINS IN LUSCIOUS MILK CHOCOLATE | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 0 MG | 64 MG | |
| Iron, Fe | 2.9 MG | 0 MG | |
| Potassium, K | 0 MG | 125 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 120 MG | 107 MG |