COCONUT & MARSHMALLOW COVERED CHOCOLATE CAKE WITH CREAMY FILLING vs PETITE CHOCOLATE BUNDT CAKES
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
PETITE CHOCOLATE BUNDT CAKES wins in 4 out of 12 nutrient categories
COCONUT & MARSHMALLOW COVERED CHOCOLATE CAKE WITH CREAMY FILLING: 3
vs
PETITE CHOCOLATE BUNDT CAKES: 4
(5 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | COCONUT & MARSHMALLOW COVERED CHOCOLATE CAKE WITH CREAMY FILLING | PETITE CHOCOLATE BUNDT CAKES | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 320 cal | 457 cal | |
| Protein | 2 g | 5.7 g | |
| Carbs | 58 g | 51.4 g | |
| Fat | 10 g | 25.7 g | |
| Fiber | 2 g | 2.9 g | |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | COCONUT & MARSHMALLOW COVERED CHOCOLATE CAKE WITH CREAMY FILLING | PETITE CHOCOLATE BUNDT CAKES | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
| Vitamin D (D2 + D3) | 0 UG | 0 UG | Tie |
Minerals
| Mineral | COCONUT & MARSHMALLOW COVERED CHOCOLATE CAKE WITH CREAMY FILLING | PETITE CHOCOLATE BUNDT CAKES | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
| Iron, Fe | 1.8 MG | 2.1 MG | |
| Potassium, K | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
| Sodium, Na | 360 MG | 357 MG |