COCONUT MACAROON COOKIES vs ORIGINAL FUDGE COVERED GRAHAM COOKIES
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
COCONUT MACAROON COOKIES wins in 5 out of 10 nutrient categories
COCONUT MACAROON COOKIES: 5
vs
ORIGINAL FUDGE COVERED GRAHAM COOKIES: 0
(5 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | COCONUT MACAROON COOKIES | ORIGINAL FUDGE COVERED GRAHAM COOKIES | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 464 cal | 500 cal | |
| Protein | 3.6 g | 3.6 g | Tie |
| Carbs | 64.3 g | 67.9 g | |
| Fat | 21.4 g | 21.4 g | Tie |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Minerals
| Mineral | COCONUT MACAROON COOKIES | ORIGINAL FUDGE COVERED GRAHAM COOKIES | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 29 MG | 0 MG | |
| Iron, Fe | 3.6 MG | 3.6 MG | Tie |
| Potassium, K | 89 MG | 0 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 339 MG | 286 MG |