COCONUT ALMOND QUINOA CRUNCH vs CLASSICS THIN STYLE BEEF JERKY
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
CLASSICS THIN STYLE BEEF JERKY wins in 5 out of 10 nutrient categories
COCONUT ALMOND QUINOA CRUNCH: 4
vs
CLASSICS THIN STYLE BEEF JERKY: 5
(1 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | COCONUT ALMOND QUINOA CRUNCH | CLASSICS THIN STYLE BEEF JERKY | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 500 cal | 250 cal | |
| Protein | 17.7 g | 53.6 g | |
| Carbs | 47.1 g | 7.1 g | |
| Fat | 29.4 g | 7.1 g | |
| Fiber | 11.8 g | 0 g | |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | COCONUT ALMOND QUINOA CRUNCH | CLASSICS THIN STYLE BEEF JERKY | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 3.5 MG | 0 MG |
Minerals
| Mineral | COCONUT ALMOND QUINOA CRUNCH | CLASSICS THIN STYLE BEEF JERKY | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 118 MG | 0 MG | |
| Iron, Fe | 5.3 MG | 5.1 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 0 MG | 2,429 MG |