COCK BRAND vs ORGANIC COCONUT SUGAR
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
It's a tie — both foods score equally across 11 nutrient categories
COCK BRAND: 2
vs
ORGANIC COCONUT SUGAR: 2
(7 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | COCK BRAND | ORGANIC COCONUT SUGAR | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 375 cal | 333 cal | |
| Protein | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Carbs | 100 g | 100 g | Tie |
| Fat | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | COCK BRAND | ORGANIC COCONUT SUGAR | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
Minerals
| Mineral | COCK BRAND | ORGANIC COCONUT SUGAR | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 500 MG | 0 MG | |
| Iron, Fe | 9 MG | 0 MG | |
| Potassium, K | 0 MG | 1,067 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |