COATED CRISPED RICE TREATS vs ORIGINAL CRISPY MARSHMALLOW SQUARES
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
ORIGINAL CRISPY MARSHMALLOW SQUARES wins in 7 out of 13 nutrient categories
COATED CRISPED RICE TREATS: 3
vs
ORIGINAL CRISPY MARSHMALLOW SQUARES: 7
(3 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | COATED CRISPED RICE TREATS | ORIGINAL CRISPY MARSHMALLOW SQUARES | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 456 cal | 409 cal | |
| Protein | 3.5 g | 4.6 g | |
| Carbs | 66.7 g | 77.3 g | |
| Fat | 19.3 g | 9.1 g | |
| Fiber | 1.8 g | 0 g | |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | COATED CRISPED RICE TREATS | ORIGINAL CRISPY MARSHMALLOW SQUARES | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Niacin | 0 MG | 9.1 MG | |
| Riboflavin | 0 MG | 0.8 MG | |
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
Minerals
| Mineral | COATED CRISPED RICE TREATS | ORIGINAL CRISPY MARSHMALLOW SQUARES | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 35 MG | 0 MG | |
| Iron, Fe | 3.2 MG | 3.2 MG | |
| Potassium, K | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
| Sodium, Na | 211 MG | 477 MG |