CLASSIC STYLE PLANT-BASED FISH BURGERS vs BALL PARK
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
CLASSIC STYLE PLANT-BASED FISH BURGERS wins in 5 out of 12 nutrient categories
CLASSIC STYLE PLANT-BASED FISH BURGERS: 5
vs
BALL PARK: 4
(3 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | CLASSIC STYLE PLANT-BASED FISH BURGERS | BALL PARK | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 142 cal | 286 cal | |
| Protein | 18.6 g | 18.2 g | |
| Carbs | 8.0 g | 0 g | |
| Fat | 4.4 g | 23.4 g | |
| Fiber | 1.8 g | 0 g | |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | CLASSIC STYLE PLANT-BASED FISH BURGERS | BALL PARK | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
| Vitamin D (D2 + D3) | 0 UG | 0 UG | Tie |
Minerals
| Mineral | CLASSIC STYLE PLANT-BASED FISH BURGERS | BALL PARK | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 44 MG | 78 MG | |
| Iron, Fe | 3.5 MG | 1.4 MG | |
| Potassium, K | 204 MG | 234 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 487 MG | 649 MG |